Rothschild

Rothschild v. Gildred

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20233:23-cv-01713California529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS ETIENNE ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 23-cv-01713-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

STEPHANIE ANN GILDRED, et al., Re: ECF No. 19 Defendants.

12 At the Initial Case Management Conference for this matter, held on July 13, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff Thomas Etienne Rothschild leave to file a Second Amended Complaint by July 20, 2023, as the First Amended Complaint had inadvertent omissions. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff missed this deadline. On July 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Extension of Time to Amend,” requesting an extension until July 27, 2023, due to “[w]eather reasons of heat extremity and illness.” ECF No. 19 at 1.1 Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Amend does not comply with the requirements of Civil Local Rule 6-3 for motions to enlarge or shorten time. In particular, Plaintiff’s motion is not accompanied by a proposed order or a declaration that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.