Bratton

Bratton v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20235:20-cv-03885California6,118 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD W. BRATTON,

Case No. 20-cv-03885 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO

v. AMEND; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

TO FILE THIRD AMENDED

RON BROOMFIELD, et al., COMPLAINT; DENYING MOTION

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Defendants. AND OTHER MOTION

(Docket Nos. 30, 42, 43)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison officials and staff at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) where he is currently incarcerated. Dkt. No. 1. The second amended complaint (“SAC”) is the operative complaint in this matter. Dkt. No. 21. The Court found the SAC, liberally construed, stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim and ordered service on Defendants S. Albritton, Dr. S. Garrigan, Dr. Sandler, A. Maxfield, and N. Smith. Dkt. No. 22. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.