Bratton
Bratton v. Broomfield
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20235:20-cv-03885California6,118 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RONALD W. BRATTON,
Case No. 20-cv-03885 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO
v. AMEND; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF
TO FILE THIRD AMENDED
RON BROOMFIELD, et al., COMPLAINT; DENYING MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Defendants. AND OTHER MOTION
(Docket Nos. 30, 42, 43)
17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison officials and staff at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) where he is currently incarcerated. Dkt. No. 1. The second amended complaint (“SAC”) is the operative complaint in this matter. Dkt. No. 21. The Court found the SAC, liberally construed, stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim and ordered service on Defendants S. Albritton, Dr. S. Garrigan, Dr. Sandler, A. Maxfield, and N. Smith. Dkt. No. 22. …