Saddozai

Saddozai v. Bolanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20235:18-cv-03972California1,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHIKEB SADDOZAI,

Case No. 18-cv-03972 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION 13 TERRY ARQUEZA, successor to A. 14 ARQUEZA, et al., Defendant. (Docket No. 122)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The second amended complaint (“SAC”) is the operative complaint in this action. Dkt. No. 23. The sole defendant in this action, deceased Officer A. Arqueza, was substituted by his widow, Mrs. Terry Arqueza, as his successor. Dkt. No. 52. The Court ordered the matter to proceed on the cognizable claims against Defendant Arqueza. Id. at 2. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, supported by declarations and exhibits, Dkt. No. 71, to which Plaintiff did not file an opposition although given extensive time to do so. On June 26, 2023, the Court granted Defendant’s summary judgment …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.