Quackenbush

Quackenbush v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20233:20-cv-05599California1,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY QUACKENBUSH, MARISSA FEENEY, and ANNE PELLETTIERI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly No. Civ 20-05599 WHA situated, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE ON CLASS NOTICE v. AND OMNIBUS ORDER RE MOTIONS TO SEAL

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR

COMPANY, INC., and HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD., a Japanese Corporation, 16 Defendants.

The undersigned has read plaintiffs’ response regarding an updated class notice, and defers to counsel’s representation that further notice is unnecessary (Dkt. No. 287). As such, American Pipe notice will not be required. As part of that foregoing response, plaintiffs’ counsel filed class notice and exclusion lists. These are Exhibits B and C to the Schwartz Declaration, and plaintiffs seek to seal those exhibits in their entirety, which contain the names and addresses of class members (Dkt. No. 286). Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to seal the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.