Floyd

Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Correction

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20233:22-cv-00750California3,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 22-cv-00750-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS, DENYING MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS, AND DENYING

SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL CORRECTION, et al., JUDGMENT 12 Defendants. 13 Pro se Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd alleges that his constitutional rights were 14 violated at two county holding facilities where he was detained after his arrest in August 15 2021. Floyd alleges that he was denied adequate access to the bathroom and to a phone 16 call and was forcibly placed into a wheelchair and stripped naked. See Third Amended 17 Compl. (“TAC”) (dkt. 78) at 9–12. Floyd brings suit against the Santa Clara Department 18 of Correction, the County of Santa Clara, the County of Santa Clara Office of the Sheriff, 19 Elmwood Correctional Facility, and employees of these institutions in their official and 20 individual capacities. See TAC at 17–18. 21 The County of Santa Clara moves to dismiss the proposed defendants: Agustin, 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.