Hulstedt

Hulstedt v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20233:23-cv-02003California1,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 DOUGLAS VERN HULSTEDT, Case No. 23-cv-02003-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS

v. 7 Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 9, 10, 11, 36, 38, 44, 45, 46, ROBERT ANDRES BONTA, et al., 55, 59 Defendants.

10 Douglas Vern Hulstedt, proceeding without the assistance of a lawyer, brings this suit against Attorney General Bonta, Laurie Rose Lubiano, and the State Bar of California. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment before Defendants answered the complaint. Defendants Bonta and Lubiano now move to dismiss the complaint. Both motions, along with Plaintiff’s numerous other filings, are now pending before the Court. The Court finds the motions appropriate for disposition without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. All other pending motions are DENIED. DISCUSSION I. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment, arguing Defendants failed to respond to his complaint. (Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.