Hunter

Hunter v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20234:22-cv-06777California4,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERIC HUNTER, Case No. 22-cv-06777-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND AND

v. GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION

TO DISMISS

FCA US LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 16 Defendant.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Eric Hunter’s (“Hunter” or “Plaintiff”) motion to remand, which Defendant FCA US LLC (“FCA” or “Defendant”) opposes. See Dkt. Nos. 13, 14. Also before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 16 (“MTD”). The Court finds that these matters are appropriate for disposition without oral argument and they are deemed submitted. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7–1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion to remand and GRANTS the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a California resident who purchased a model-year 2019 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 19 Unlimited manufactured by Defendant. See Class Action Complaint, Dkt. No. 2-1 (“Compl.”), ¶¶ 20 8, 11. Plaintiff alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.