Hunter
Hunter v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERIC HUNTER, Case No. 22-cv-06777-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND AND
v. GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION
TO DISMISS
FCA US LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 16 Defendant.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Eric Hunter’s (“Hunter” or “Plaintiff”) motion to remand, which Defendant FCA US LLC (“FCA” or “Defendant”) opposes. See Dkt. Nos. 13, 14. Also before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 16 (“MTD”). The Court finds that these matters are appropriate for disposition without oral argument and they are deemed submitted. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7–1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion to remand and GRANTS the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a California resident who purchased a model-year 2019 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 19 Unlimited manufactured by Defendant. See Class Action Complaint, Dkt. No. 2-1 (“Compl.”), ¶¶ 20 8, 11. Plaintiff alleges…