BJB ELECTRIC LP v. BRIDGELUX, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20233:22-cv-01886California3,242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BJB ELECTRIC LP,

Case No. 22-cv-01886-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRIDGELUX, INC.,

13 Defendant.

BRIDGELUX, INC, Counter-Claimant, v.

BJB ELECTRIC LP,

Counter-Defendant. 20 Plaintiff BJB Electric LP filed this lawsuit alleging that Defendant Bridgelux, Inc. 21 breached a Letter Agreement requiring Defendant either to purchase a minimum number of LED 22 holders within four years of the product’s first availability (through October 2020) or to pay 23 liquidated damages. Defendant counterclaimed, alleging Plaintiff breached the Letter Agreement 24 beginning in April 2022 by changing the terms of the Agreement and refusing to deliver any 25 additional LED holders unless payment was made prior to delivery. Both parties have filed cross- 26 motions for partial summary judgment on Defendant’s liability for breach of the Letter 27 Agreement. For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.