BJB ELECTRIC LP v. BRIDGELUX, INC.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BJB ELECTRIC LP,
Case No. 22-cv-01886-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE
BRIDGELUX, INC.,
13 Defendant.
BRIDGELUX, INC, Counter-Claimant, v.
BJB ELECTRIC LP,
Counter-Defendant. 20 Plaintiff BJB Electric LP filed this lawsuit alleging that Defendant Bridgelux, Inc. 21 breached a Letter Agreement requiring Defendant either to purchase a minimum number of LED 22 holders within four years of the product’s first availability (through October 2020) or to pay 23 liquidated damages. Defendant counterclaimed, alleging Plaintiff breached the Letter Agreement by refusing to deliver more LED holders unless payment was made prior to delivery.1 Each side 25 26 1 The report proffered by Defendant’s expert Lawrence Leavitt predicates counterclaim damages 27 on an allegation that Plaintiff increased the price of its LED holders in May 2022, which did not believing the other owes it,…