Peters

Peters v. Twist Bioscience Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20235:22-cv-08168California4,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANTHONY JOSEPH PETERS, Case No. 5:22-cv-08168-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER APPOINTING LEAD

PLAINTIFF AND SELECTING LEAD

v. COUNSEL

TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORPORATION, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 16, 22, 26, 36, 40, 43 12 Defendants.

13 The Court has received several motions to appoint lead plaintiff and select lead counsel in this securities class action governed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). After all the opening motions seeking appointment had been submitted, all but two movants withdrew or expressed non-opposition to the remaining plaintiffs seeking appointment. The two remaining movants are the University of Puerto Rico (“UPR”) Retirement System, ECF No. 26, and the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago (“PABF”), ECF No. 43. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court GRANTS PABF’s Motion for Appointment as Lead…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.