McKay

McKay v. Fay Servicing, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20233:23-cv-03731California853 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 APRIL MCKAY, Case No. 23-cv-03731-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

FAY SERVICING, LLC, Docket No. 4 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff April McKay has filed a foreclosure-related suit against Defendant Fay Servicing, LLC. Currently pending before the Court is her motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). In the motion, Ms. McKay asks that the Court enjoin a foreclosure sale of certain real property located in Antioch, at least pending a hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction. Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, the Court hereby DENIES Ms. McKay’s motion. Fay Servicing has opposed Ms. McKay’s motion on the basis that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the case. If the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, then it cannot issue a TRO even if the TRO simply preserves the status quo. In her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.