Dangaard
Dangaard v. Instagram, LLC
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20233:22-cv-01101California4,600 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAWN DANGAARD, KELLY GILBERT, and JENNIFER ALLBAUGH, No. C 22-01101 WHA Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER RE FENIX DEFENDANTS’
INSTAGRAM, LLC, FACEBOOK FRCP 12(B)(2) MOTION TO DISMISS
OPERATIONS, LLC, FENIX INTERNET AND RELATED MOTIONS TO SEAL
LLC, FENIX INTERNATIONAL LTD.,
META PLATFORMS, INC., LEONID RADVINSKY, and JOHN DOES 1–10, 16 Defendants.
INTRODUCTION This diversity and putative class action concerns claims of unfair competition and tortious interference with contracts and business relationships. A prior order held defendants’ motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(2) in abeyance pending jurisdictional discovery (Dkt. No. 65). A period of supplemental jurisdictional discovery was then permitted (Dkt. No. 159). With the granted window for jurisdictional discovery now closed, defendants’ motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(2) is GRANTED. STATEMENT Our…