Dangaard

Dangaard v. Instagram, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20233:22-cv-01101California4,600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAWN DANGAARD, KELLY GILBERT, and JENNIFER ALLBAUGH, No. C 22-01101 WHA Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER RE FENIX DEFENDANTS’

INSTAGRAM, LLC, FACEBOOK FRCP 12(B)(2) MOTION TO DISMISS

OPERATIONS, LLC, FENIX INTERNET AND RELATED MOTIONS TO SEAL

LLC, FENIX INTERNATIONAL LTD.,

META PLATFORMS, INC., LEONID RADVINSKY, and JOHN DOES 1–10, 16 Defendants.

INTRODUCTION This diversity and putative class action concerns claims of unfair competition and tortious interference with contracts and business relationships. A prior order held defendants’ motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(2) in abeyance pending jurisdictional discovery (Dkt. No. 65). A period of supplemental jurisdictional discovery was then permitted (Dkt. No. 159). With the granted window for jurisdictional discovery now closed, defendants’ motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(2) is GRANTED. STATEMENT Our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.