Lamba

Lamba v. ASML US, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20235:23-cv-01833California3,080 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 VISHAL LAMBA, Case No. 23-cv-01833-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND

ASML US, L.P., et al., [Re: ECF No. 13] Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Vishal Lamba (“Lamba”) has filed suit against Defendants ASML, a corporation, and Shannon Hildreth (“Hildreth”), an individual, (collectively the “Defendants”) asserting claims for breach of contract, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and restitution based on unjust enrichment. ECF No. 1-1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 27-43. Before the Court is Hildreth’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion, and the time for doing so has expired. The Court finds the motion to dismiss suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court HEREBY VACATES the hearing scheduled for September 14, 2023. See ECF No. 13. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.