In Re PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 eeCuRtee UINGANION Case No. 5:18-cv-03509-EJD ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

INTERVENE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

8 Re: ECF No. 229 10 Before the Court is a motion to intervene by approximately 700 putative class members (“Intervenors”). Mot. to Intervene, ECF No. 229. They seek to intervene in order to oppose any efforts by the parties to dissolve the stay that the Court entered on September 30, 2022 (ECF No. || 217) and/or any forthcoming motion for preliminary approval of settlement. Mot. to Intervene 1. The Court holds that it is without jurisdiction to consider Intervenors’ motion. “An appeal, a || including an interlocutory appeal, ‘divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.’” Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 143 S. Ct. 1915, 1919 (2023) (quoting Griggs v. Provident Consumer…