Robinson

BGC Inc. v. Robinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20234:22-cv-01582California230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BGC INC., Case No. 22-cv-01582-JSW Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

? . Re: Dkt. Nos. 84, 85 RAUHMEL FOX ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. L

On July 3, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion to enforce a settlement agreement || and concluded that Plaintiff was entitled to its attorneys’ fees. On July 24, 2023, Plaintiff filed a || declaration regarding the amount of fees incurred. Defendants’ opposition to the amount of fees a || was due on July 31, 2023, but they have not filed an opposition.

On July 25, 2023, new counsel entered an appearance on behalf of both Defendants and Z || filed a notice of appeal. In general, a court retains “the power to award attorney’s fees after the || notice of appeal from the decision on the merits” has been filed. Masalosalo v. Stonewall Ins. Co., || 718 F.2d 955, 957 (9th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.