S.J.

S.J. v. Albany Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20234:20-cv-06414California4,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 S.J., Case No. 20-cv-06414-KAW

Plaintiff,

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

v. TENTATIVE RULINGS

ALBANY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 I. MOTIONS IN LIMINE Relevant evidence is any evidence that has any tendency to make a fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Fed. R. Evid. 401. The Court has discretion to “exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of . . . unfair prejudice, confusing the issue, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.” 20 MIL Motion Ruling Reason/Explanation 22 Defendant does not oppose. To the Limit Defendant’s expert testimony to extent Plaintiff seeks to limit Dr. Schwartzberg’s opinion to seven 24 P1 opinions expressed in GRANT specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.