Reynolds
Reynolds v. EzriCare LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MILTON REYNOLDS, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01632-JSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 20 EZRICARE LLC, et al., Defendants.
12 Plaintiffs brought this action in Alameda County Superior Court against Ezricare, LLC, EzriRx, LLC, Global Pharma Healthcare Private Limited, Aru Pharma, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., and a “Doe” Amazon Delivery Service Partner. Defendants removed the matter to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is now pending before the Court. After carefully considering the briefing, the Court concludes oral argument is not necessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), vacates the August 3, 2023 hearing, and DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. Doe defendant allegations cannot defeat diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. 1441(b)(1); Soliman v. Philip Morris Inc., 311 F.3d 966, 971 (9th Cir. 2002). COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Defendants Ezricare, EzriRX, Aru Pharma,…