California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. DenBeste Yard & Garden, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING Case No. 22-cv-01975-DMR

PROTECTION ALLIANCE,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN v. SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10 DENBESTE YARD & GARDEN , INC., Re: Dkt. No. 19 11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant DenBeste Yard & Garden, Inc. [Docket No. 19 (“Mot.”).] On February 24, 2023, the court denied Plaintiff’s motion without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability to submit supplemental briefing and evidence. [Docket No. 26.] The court instructed Plaintiff to address each factor enumerated in San Francisco Baykeeper v. W. Bay Sanitary Dist., 791 F. Supp. 2d 719 (N.D. Cal. 2011). In San Francisco Baykeeper, the court held that “[t]o establish a violation of the [Clean Water] Act’s [National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit] requirements, a plaintiff must prove that (1) a person (2) discharged (3) a…