Harris

Harris v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20233:22-cv-00529California4,619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL JAY HARRIS, Case No. 22-cv-00529-EMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING (1) DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

v. AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL DISCOVERY; AND

MATTHEW ATCHLEY, et al., GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

Defendants. A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

12 Docket Nos. 24, 28, 41

14 This is a pro se prisoner’s civil rights action. Plaintiff Michael Harris alleges that he is “a convicted child rapist and molester 19 times over,” Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”) ¶ 43, and raises claims regarding his impending transfer from sensitive needs custody at Salinas Valley State Prison to a non-designated yard, see generally, id. The Court reviewed the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, dismissed its claims in part, and ordered Defendants to respond to the remaining claim. See Docket No. 10 (“Screening Order”). Mr. Harris filed three motions seeking temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.