Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20235:22-cv-04844California1,410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

v. SEAL REGARDING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., EXHIBITS Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 88, 95, 101

Before the Court are (1) Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff”) administrative motion, filed in connection with her pending Refiled Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“MSJ”), to consider whether another party’s material should be sealed, ECF No. 88; (2) Defendant Zazzle, Inc.’s (“Zazzle”) sealing statement regarding Plaintiff’s administrative motion, ECF No. 95; and (3) Zazzle’s administrative motion to seal regarding an exhibit filed in support of its opposition to Plaintiff’s MSJ, ECF No. 101. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and applicable sealing law, the Court GRANTS Zazzle’s requests to seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.