Amin

Amin v. Subway Restaurants, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20234:21-cv-00498California3,750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NILIMA AMIN, Case No. 21-cv-00498-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUBWAY RESTAURANTS, INC., et al., SANCTIONS Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 93, 102

12 Before the Court are Plaintiff Nilima Amin’s motion to dismiss her claims and Defendants Subway Restaurants, Inc., Franchise World Headquarters LLC, and Subway Franchisee Advertising Trust Fund LTD’s (“Subway”) motion for sanctions. ECF Nos. 93, 102. The Court will grant Amin’s motion to dismiss and deny Subway’s motion for sanctions. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff in this putative class action contends that Subway misrepresents the content of its tuna products. See ECF Nos. 4, 33, 54, 63. Before Plaintiff filed the action, her counsel, Shalini Dogra, sent demand letters to Subway on behalf of another Subway customer,1 stating that her client intended to bring a class action against Subway for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.