Unite Here! Local 2 v. Stix Holdings, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20233:23-cv-01498California4,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITE HERE! LOCAL 2,

Case No. 23-cv-01498-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ATTORNEYS' STIX HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., FEES AND COSTS 13 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Following the previous order granting its motion to enforce an arbitration award, Plaintiff United Here! Local 2 has moved to recover its attorneys’ fees and costs from Defendants Pick Up Stix SFO LLC and Stix Holdings LLC under the district court’s “inherent powers” to issue sanctions. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), this matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument; the hearing set for August 10, 2023 is therefore vacated. For the reasons articulated below, the motion for fees and costs is granted in part and denied in part. II. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff and Defendant were parties to a Card Check Neutrality Agreement (”Agreement”) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.