Andersen

Andersen v. Papa, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20233:21-cv-06326California796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 CARICE ASHLEY ANDERSEN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06326-RS (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE

v. Re: Dkt. No. 55 PAPA, INC., et al., Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is a jointly filed letter brief (dkt. 55) setting forth a discovery dispute in this wage and hour case that is brought both as a putative class action, as well as being filed under California Labor Code § 2698 et seq. (Private Attorneys General Act “PAGA”) (see Third Amend. Compl. (dkt. 45). The matter came on to be heard at oral argument on August 8, 2023. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ request to compel is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs’ portion of the letter brief asks for certain contact information (California-based Pals) (“Pals” are a category of Defendant’s employees) and certain policy documents. See Ltr. Br. (dkt. 55) at 3. As to the policy documents, Defendant states that “Plaintiff has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.