Smith v. Office of the Alameda County Public Defender

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20234:20-cv-08534California3,575 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 REGINALD SMITH, Case No. 20-cv-08534-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OFFICE OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 87, 118 11 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Reginald Smith, ECF No. 87, and Defendants Office of the Alameda County Public Defender (“ACPD”), Diane Bellas, Brendan Woods, Margo George, County of Alameda, and County of Alameda Board of Supervisors, ECF No. 118. The Court will deny Smith’s motion for summary judgment, and grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND Smith alleges that he was detained at Coalinga State Hospital for 12 years without access to a jury trial under California’s Sexually Violent Predator Act (“SVPA) in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. In 2008, the Alameda County District Attorney…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.