Sparkman
Sparkman v. Comerica Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAULA SPARKMAN, Case No. 23-cv-02028-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
v. AND TO STRIKE
COMERICA BANK, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 18 Defendants.
Plaintiff Paula Sparkman filed this putative class action against Defendants Comerica Bank and Conduent Business Services, LLC alleging claims under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693, and California law related to Defendants’ operation of prepaid debit cards through which a state agency disburses child support payments. Defendants move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint. They also move to strike Sparkman’s demand for a jury trial. [Docket Nos. 16 (Mot. to Dismiss), 18 (Mot. to Strike).] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The motion to strike is denied. I. …