TPCO US Holdings, LLC v. Ned Fussell

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20233:23-cv-01324California1,951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TPCO US HOLDING, LLC, Case No. 23-cv-01324-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

NED FUSSELL, et al., Docket No. 11 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff TPCO US Holding (“TPCO”) seeks attorney fees after prevailing on a motion to remand this action to state court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). TPCO originally filed suit in state court against Defendants Ned Fussell, Mosaic Ag., Inc., Paula Bruning, Christopher Potter, Sukanya Lauer, Lacy O’Callaghan, and Does 1 through 10 (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging four state-law causes of action for breach of contract regarding a land purchase agreement, cultivation and supply agreements, loan for outdoor cannabis cultivation, and declaratory relief. Docket No. 1 (“Compl.”). In response to Defendants Fussell and Mosaic’s (“Removing Defendants”) improper removal to federal court, TPCO filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.