Freund

Freund v. HP, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20235:22-cv-03794California6,246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 GARY FREUND, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03794-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

HP, INC, COMPLAINT Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 47]

12 Plaintiffs Gary Freund and Wayne McMath bring this class action lawsuit against Defendant HP, Inc. Plaintiffs assert claims under California and Minnesota law based on allegations that certain HP all-in-one printers will not scan or fax when the devices have low or empty ink cartridges even though those tasks do not require ink. Now before the Court is HP’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. Mot., ECF No. 47. Plaintiffs oppose. Opp’n, ECF No. 48. HP has replied in support. Reply, ECF No. 49. Having found the matter suitable for determination without oral argument, the Court vacated the hearing on this motion. ECF No. 54. For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.