Patel

Patel v. Alphabet Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20235:23-cv-03647California827 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RAJ PATEL, Case No. 23-cv-03647-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

ALPHABET INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 17] Defendants.

12 On August 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Reconsider in Part for Dkt. 16.” ECF No. 17 (“Mot.”). Docket 16 refers to the Court’s Order granting Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and screening the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See ECF No. 16 (“Order”). The Court dismissed the FAC with leave to amend. Id. Under the Civil Local Rules for the Northern District of California, a party needs leave of Court to file a motion for reconsideration. See Civ. L.R. 7-9(a). The Court will treat this motion as a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration. Under the Civil Local Rules, a party moving for leave to file a motion for reconsideration must show reasonable diligence and one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.