Mejia

Mejia v. RXO Last Mile, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20233:22-cv-08976California4,380 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAYNOR MEJIA, Case No. 22-cv-08976-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

RXO LAST MILE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is defendant RXO Last Mile, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration. Dkt. No. 20. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED. 15 BACKGROUND Defendant RXO Last Mile, Inc.1 is in the business of “arrang[ing] freight deliveries for its customers.” Motion to Compel Arbitration (“Motion”), Dkt. No. 20, at 1. Plaintiff Maynor Mejia brings this proposed class action against RXO Last Mile, Inc., alleging that RXO denied plaintiff and other delivery drivers the benefits and protections required under the California Labor Code and other state laws. Dkt. No. 1-1, Complaint at ¶ 1. Plaintiff filed suit in the Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Alameda, Case No. 22-CV-020443. The case was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.