Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. City of Alameda

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20234:21-cv-09733California702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIO GONZALEZ, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09733-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON JULY 27, 2023 JOINT

v. DISCOVERY LETTER

CITY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 90 Defendants.

The parties filed a joint discovery letter on July 27, 2023 in which the Gonzalez Plaintiffs seek a protective order preventing Edith Arenales from contacting, deposing, or attempting to subpoena their retained experts. [Docket No. 90 (Jt. Letter).] Because Defendants are unable to depose those experts until this dispute is resolved, Defendants request that the expert discovery deadline be continued from September 15, 2023 to September 29, 2023. This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Gonzalez Plaintiffs’ motion is granted, and Defendants’ request is denied as moot. On December 8, 2022, the court denied Arenales’ motion to consolidate the trial in her case (4:22-cv-00718-DMR) with this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.