Washington v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20235:22-cv-02454California426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY WASHINGTON,

Case No. 22-cv-02454 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS &

15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. (Docket No. 27)

18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against an officer at the Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) where he was formerly incarcerated, and against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), the State of California, and the Correctional Peace Officers Association union (“CPOA”). The Court ordered the amended complaint served on April 14, 2023. Dkt. No. 21. Defendants were granted an extension of time to file a dispositive motion until no later than October 12, 2023. Dkt. No. 26. Plaintiff has filed a motion for appointment of counsel based on indigency, lack of legal knowledge, and for assistance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.