Bruzzone
Bruzzone v. United States Attorney of Northern California District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL A BRUZZONE, Case No. 22-cv-06412-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS AND MOTION TO EXPAND
v. PRE-FILING REVIEW ORDERS
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OF Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 19,
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT,
11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court are the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California’s (“Defendant” or “Government”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 14, “MTD”) and motion to expand pre-filing review orders (Dkt. No. 19, “Review Order Mot.”) as well as pro se Plaintiff’s “motion to submit known (suspect concealed) evidence in hearing” (Dkt. No. 32 “Evidence Motion”). The motions have been fully briefed. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, GRANTS Defendant’s motion to expand pre-filing…