A.L.
A.L. v. Pleasanton Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A.L., et al., Case No. 22-cv-03036-CRB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v.
DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff A.L., by and through her parent and guardian ad litem, Joseph Lain 17 (“Plaintiffs”) bring various claims against two public educational entities, the Pleasanton 18 Unified School District (“PUSD”) and the Contra Costa County Office of Education 19 (“CCCOE”; together, the “Defendants”), for failure to provide A.L., a child with Wolf- 20 Hirschhorn syndrome, with an appropriate education. 21 The Court has addressed two prior rounds of motions to dismiss in this case, and 22 Defendants now move to dismiss two of Plaintiffs’ claims—breach of implied covenant of 23 good faith and fair dealing (claim IV) and fraud (claim V)—for the third time. See PUSD 24 Mot. (dkt. 57); CCCOE Mot. (dkt. 58); A.L. v. Pleasanton Unified Sch. Dist., No. 22-cv- 25 03036, 2022 WL 16528141 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2022) [hereinafter…