Dupraz

Dupraz v. DOES 1-10

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20234:22-cv-07709California690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LEONARD DUPRAZ, et al., Case No. 4:22-cv-07709-KAW

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO

PLAINTIFFS; ORDER VACATING

v. 8/17/23 HEARING

DOES 1-10,, Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendant.

12 On December 7, 2022, Plaintiffs Leonard Dupraz and Celeste Lee filed this lawsuit against Doe Defendants alleging that their respective Instagram accounts were “hacked,” which led to the accounts being disabled. (Compl., Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 1, 8-11, 14-15.) Plaintiffs have not been able to reactivate their accounts. (FAC ¶¶ 12, 14-15.) In February 2023, Plaintiffs served an amended subpoena on nonparty Meta Platforms, Inc., which owns Instagram. On July 6, 2023, Meta filed a motion to quash the subpoena. (Dkt. No. 20.) Plaintiff’s complaint alleges four causes of action; only one of which is a federal claim. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030, generally attaches criminal penalties to cyber-based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.