Montoya

Montoya v. GoPro Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20233:23-cv-04082California3,004 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Miguel Montoya,

Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 22-1534 (DRD)

v.

GOPRO, INC., ACME,

Defendants.

Opinion and Order Before the Court is defendant GoPro Inc.’s (“GoPro”) motion for transfer of venue, or alternatively, to dismiss the complaint and compel arbitration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) or dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Docket No. 13. GoPro moves to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California pursuant to the arbitration agreement between the parties. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS GoPro’s motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California. GoPro’s requests for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and to compel arbitration are, therefore, DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Hence the Court proceeds to order to send the instant case to the Northern District of California. The Court explains.

I. Procedural and Factual Background

Mr. Miguel Montoya (“Montoya”) is a citizen of Puerto Rico, resident of the Municipality of Guaynabo. Docket No. 1 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.