Doe 1 v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20233:22-cv-01559California12,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE Case No. 22-cv-01559-LB 3, JOHN DOE 4, JOHN DOE 5, JOHN DOE 6, JOHN DOE 7, JOHN DOE 8, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

JOHN DOE 9, JOHN DOE 10, JOHN DOE DISMISS IN PART

11, JOHN DOE 12, JOHN DOE 13, and JOHN DOE 14, individually and on behalf Re: ECF Nos. 103, 104, 105 of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, ANTHONY N. (AKA

NINO) GIARRATANO, and TROY

NAKAMURA,

19 Defendants. 20 INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs in this putative class action are former University of San Francisco Division I baseball players who are proceeding as John Does 1–3 (more recent players) and John Does 4–14 (earlier players). The plaintiffs allege that since 1999, USF head coach Anthony Giarratano and assistant coach Troy Nakamura created a sexualized environment — by being naked, miming and discussing sexual acts, belittling players with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.