Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. Rorze Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20235:22-cv-04947California3,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI Case No. 5:22-cv-04947-EJD

KAISHA,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR Plaintiff, PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION AND AMENDING JUNE 15, 2023 ORDER v. 11 RORZE CORPORATION, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 81, 87, 92 12 Defendants.

13 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Partial Reconsideration (“Motion”) of the Court’s June 15, 2023 Order (“6/15/23 Order”) granting in part and denying in part Defendants Rorze Corporation and Rorze Automation, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss. Specifically, Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the dismissals of its willful infringement claims, claiming that the Court had applied a legal standard that the Federal Circuit had clarified and rejected in SRI International, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc. (“SRI”), 14 F.4th 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2021). The Court granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.