Moradpour
Moradpour v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MEYSAM MORADPOUR, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01486-SI
Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: DISCOVERY, DENYING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
v. SEAL AND DENYING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
VELODYNE LIDAR, INC., et al., SUPPLEMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 195, 196, 204-205
The parties have submitted two discovery disputes to the Court. Regarding the first dispute, the Court has reviewed the redacted documents provided by the parties to determine whether Velodyne must provide a privilege log for every redaction. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5) 15 provides that when a party withholds information otherwise discoverable by claiming the material 16 is privileged, the party must provide enough information about the document to “enable other parties 17 to assess the claim.” Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(b)(5). After review of the documents, the Court agrees 18 with defendants that they need not provide a privilege log that describes the author, date, or type of 19…