Goldstein

Centre 11 LLC v. Goldstein

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20235:23-cv-03981California260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CENTRE 11 LLC, Case No. 23-cv-03981-BLF Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

1] STEVEN GOLDSTEIN, MATTER JURISDICTION Defendant.

Defendant Steven Goldstein (“Goldstein”) removed this unlawful detainer action to federal || district court on August 8, 2023, asserting the existence of federal question jurisdiction under 28 || U.S.C. § 1331. See Not. of Removal, ECF 1. Federal question jurisdiction exists for “all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Z || “The presence or absence of federal-question jurisdiction is governed by the ‘well-pleaded || complaint rule,’ which provides that federal jurisdiction exists only when a federal question is 20 || presented on the face of the plaintiff’s properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.