Borodaenko
Borodaenko v. Twitter, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DMITRY BORODAENKO, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07226-AMO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING CONSOLIDATION
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 46 TWITTER, INC., et al., Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate Cases. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for July 20, 2023, was vacated. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. BACKGROUND Through the instant motion, Plaintiffs in this matter propose consolidating this case with two others in this District: Strifling, et al., v. Twitter, Inc. et al., Case No. 22-cv-07739-JST (N.D. Cal.), and Zeman v. Twitter Inc., et al., Case No. 23-cv-01786-SI (N.D. Cal.). A brief recap of these three cases is helpful. A. FACTS COMMON TO ALL THE CASES This action and…