Ward

Ward v. Lawrence

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20234:19-cv-00183California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANJALI WARD, et al., Case No. 19-cv-00183-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. STATUS ON APPEAL

JUDITH ELIZABETH LAWRENCE, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 206, 209 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs Anjali Ward and Lila Cast have filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. ECF No. 206. In addition, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has referred the matter to this Court “for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith.” ECF No. 209. The Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint with leave to amend certain claims, ECF No. 195, and subsequently dismissed the case for failure to prosecute after Plaintiffs failed to file a third amended complaint, ECF No. 204. “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). It is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.