Turner

Turner v. Argo Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20233:23-cv-03542California3,164 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TERRANCE TURNER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03542-TSH

Plaintiffs,

SECOND SCREENING ORDER

v.

ARGO GROUP, et al., Defendants.

13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Terrance Turner, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. On July 24, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the complaint, finding it deficient under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has now filed a Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 11. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds the amended complaint is still deficient. No later than September 14, 2023, Plaintiff must file a third amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in this screening order. If Plaintiff fails to cure these deficiencies, the case will be reassigned to a Unites States district judge with a recommendation for dismissal. II. LEGAL STANDARD 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.