Williams v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20233:23-cv-01863California7,674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division ASHLEY WILLIAMS, Case No. 23-cv-01863-LB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS WAGE-AND-HOURS

v. CLAIMS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES Re: ECF No.

USA, INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Ashley Williams, formerly a security guard for defendant Securitas Security Services, sued Securitas for sexual harassment, retaliation, and wage-and-hour violations. Asserting diversity and federal-question jurisdiction, Securitas removed the case to federal court and moved to dismiss the wage-and-hour claims on the grounds that (1) a collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) governs the claims and § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) thus preempts them, and (2) the plaintiff does not plausibly plead the claims. The court grants the motion on both grounds. 24 25 26 27 STATEMENT 1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.