Depianti
Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GLORIA ROMAN, GERARDO VASQUEZ, and JUAN AGUILAR, No. C 16-05961 WHA Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL
JAN-PRO FRANCHISING ARBITRATION
INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant.
14 With trial looming, defendant has moved to compel absent class members to arbitration (Dkt. No. 454). Defendant also requests a stay in the event its motion is denied until a final appellate decision has been made, citing Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 143 S.Ct. 1915 (2023). Plaintiffs have filed their brief in opposition and a corresponding administrative motion to shorten time for the hearing on defendant’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 461). This order finds reply briefing unnecessary, and defendant’s motion to compel arbitration suitable for disposition on the papers under Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). The hearing is hereby VACATED, and plaintiffs’ administrative motion DENIED AS MOOT. Our prior order certifying the class…