Riley

Riley v. Quantumscape Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20235:22-cv-03871California5,615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 GILBERT RILEY, Case No. 22-cv-03871-BLF

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AND COSTS AND AN AWARD OF

QUANTUMSCAPE CORP., POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST Respondent. [Re: ECF No. 49]

12 Before the Court is Respondent QuantumScape Corporation’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and an award of post-judgment interest. See Mot., ECF No. 49. QuantumScape seeks from Petitioner Gilbert Riley fees and costs related to QuantumScape’s opposition to Riley’s petition to vacate an arbitration award and QuantumScape’s cross-motion to confirm the same. QuantumScape also seeks post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Riley opposes the motion. Opp’n ECF No. 54. QuantumScape has replied. Reply, ECF No. 55. The Court found this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. See Order, ECF No. 56. For the following reasons,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.