Wilkins

Wilkins v. PayPal, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20235:23-cv-02931California3,893 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BRIAN A. WILKINS, Case No. 23-cv-02931-VKD

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITION TO

v. VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD

PAYPAL, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Respondent.

13 Petitioner Brian A. Wilkins, who is representing himself, asks the Court to vacate an arbitration award resulting from a dispute with respondent PayPal, Inc. (“PayPal”). He argues that the award violates several provisions of California law. PayPal opposes Mr. Wilkins’s petition, arguing that it is untimely and that he has not met the standard for vacatur of an arbitration award under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. 1, et seq. (“FAA”). Dkt. No. 17. The Court held a hearing on the matter on August, 15, 2023. Dkt. No. 22. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court denies Mr. Wilkins’s petition. I. BACKGROUND Unless otherwise noted,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.