Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. v. Blaze Mobile, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20235:21-cv-02989California2,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO, LTD., et Case No. 5:21-cv-02989-EJD al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, STAY 10 v. Re: Dkt. No. 103 BLAZE MOBILE, INC., et al., 12 Defendants.

14 Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 15 (collectively, “Samsung”), initiated this suit against Defendants Blaze Mobile, Inc., and Michelle 16 Fisher (collectively, “Blaze”) seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement as to the 17 following eight patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 9,378,493, 9,652,771, 9,996,849, 10,339,556, 18 10,621,612, 10,699,259, 10,565,575, and 10,825,007 (collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”). Blaze 19 filed a counterclaim alleging infringement as to the Patents-in-Suit. Samsung requests an order to 20 stay the case pending the outcome of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) Ex Partes 21 Review (“EPR”) of the Patents-in-Suit.

I. THE PARTIES

23 Plaintiff Samsung Electronics…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.