Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20234:22-cv-09130California2,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KAREN RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 22-cv-09130-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO REMAND AND

v. TERMINATING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 19 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to remand and Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. Nos. 10, 19. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand and TERMINATES AS MOOT the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND In January 2019, Plaintiff Karen Rodriguez filed a PAGA complaint against her employer, Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Rodriguez I”). Dkt. No. 1-1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 10. Among other claims, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant had failed to provide suitable seats to its …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.