Refuerzo

Refuerzo v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20233:22-cv-00868California1,465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RORESTE REFUERZO and SELINA Case No. 22-cv-00868-JSC CASHIN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Plaintiffs, FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND TO

COMPEL SUPPLEMENTAL

v. DISCOVERY RESPONSES

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., Re: Dkt. No. 76 Defendant. 12 Plaintiffs sue Southwest Airlines Co. (Southwest) for penalizing flight attendants’ exercise of family and medical leave in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act and California Family Rights Act. (Dkt. No. 36.) Plaintiffs move for leave to amend the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) and an order compelling Southwest to supplement their responses to Plaintiffs’ Request for Production of Document and Electronically Stored Information to Defendants, Set Four. (Dkt. No. 76.) After carefully reviewing the briefing, and with the benefit of oral argument on August 24, 2023, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.