Big Run Studios Inc. v. AviaGames Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20233:21-cv-04656California548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BIG RUN STUDIOS INC., et al., Case No. 21-cv-04656-AMO (SVK)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE

v. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

AVIAGAMES INC., Re: Dkt. No. 177 Defendant.

Before the Court is an administrative motion to file under seal materials associated with a discovery dispute in this case. Dkt. 177; see also Dkt. 182 (statement filed in support of administrative motion to seal). Courts recognize a “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). A request to seal court records therefore starts with a “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The standard for overcoming the presumption of public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.